Posted by: maboulette | December 12, 2016

Obama Finally Wins the Hearts of Defense Hawks


After almost 8 years in office, President Obama had finally done something that makes the defense hawks happy.  As one of the last acts in office, President Obama will do something he has rarely done: please Republicans.


The president’s judgment to ask American intelligence agencies for a report on the supposed attacks of hacking connected to the presidential election, and what effect Russian may have had on the election results—was cheered by Republicans that are hawkish.  And the same with neoconservative foreign policy experts who have found almost no common ground with the Obama White House over the past eight years.


“It appears… that after eight years the administration has suddenly awoken to the threat,” said Rep. Devin Nunes, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. “Russia’s cyber-attacks are no surprise to the House Intelligence Committee, which has been closely monitoring Russia’s belligerence for years.”


“All I can say is that this is a very good but overdue move,” added Eliot Cohen, who was in the State Department under Condoleeza Rice.


The report will be delivered to Congress before Obama’s term is complete, possibly putting President-elect Donald Trump at odds with members of his own party on the eve of his inauguration.


Trump has dismissed the role of any Russian agents having some part in helping him in the presidential election.  During one debate he predicted that the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s emails could have been “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds.” However, the intelligence community has assessed that Russia bears the responsibility for the email hacks at the DNC especially with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s personal emails.

“Russia is clearly the issue on which Trump diverges the most from the rest of the GOP,” said Dan Drezner, a hawkish foreign policy intellectual who teaches at Tufts University.


In fact, while there are few issues which both parties agree on, there is wide bipartisan agreement on this issue of Russian aggression. Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham have announced their intention to begin investigations into Russia, while House Democrats have already crafted legislation that would create an independent commission to report on Russian interference in the American election, similar in concept to the 9/11 Commission.


“After many briefings by our intelligence community, it is clear to me that the Russians hacked our democratic institutions and sought to interfere in our elections and sow discord,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, who is the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, saying he was “pleased” to hear of the White House’s announced investigation, urging that they declassify as much of the investigation as possible.


Still, even while Republicans generally agreed with President Obama’s decision requesting a report on Russian interfering in the U.S. elections, some on the right wondered what took so long for him to respond to Russian aggression—and only after an election loss.  It seems to be ‘too little, too late’.


“Years enabling Putin, Kerry shining [Russian Foreign Minister] Lavrov’s shoes, and NOW he’s upset?” stated American Enterprise Institute senior vice president Danielle Pletka.  “This is blatantly political.  It’s not that Russia didn’t seek to interfere, it’s that while they were doing so, not to speak of their activities in Europe and in Syria, Obama was indifferent.” 


“The Obama administration, dedicated to delusions of ‘resetting’ relations with Russia, ignored pleas by numerous Intelligence Committee members to take more forceful action against the Kremlin’s aggression,” Nunes said.


This is one of the ironies of the 2016 presidential election, the Obama administration initially sought to ‘reset’ relations with Russia, a strategy in which Hillary Clinton was a key player.


The American attempts to form closer ties with Russia were eventually unsuccessful—Russia would go on to annex Crimea and support unrest in Ukraine—and the Eurasian nation ultimately played a key role against Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. But before Trump enters office, Obama is trying to allow lawmakers—and perhaps the public—to understand just how hard the Russians tried to influence the American votes.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: