Posted by: maboulette | January 30, 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY

Scanned image of author's US Social Security card.

Image via Wikipedia

OP-ED COLUMNIST New York Times By BOB HERBERT

Published: January 24, 2011

If there’s a better government program than Social Security, I’d like to know what it is.

It has gone a long way toward eliminating poverty among the elderly. Great numbers of them used to live and die in ghastly, Dickensian conditions of extreme want. Without Social Security today, nearly half of all Americans aged 65 or older would be poor. With it, fewer than 10 percent live in poverty.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities tells us that close to 90 percent of people 65 and older get at least some of their family income from Social Security. For more than half of the elderly, it provides the majority of their income. For many, it is the only income they have.

When you see surveillance videos of some creep mugging an elderly person in an elevator or apartment lobby, the universal reaction is outrage. But when the fat cats and the ideologues want to hack away at the lifeline of Social Security, they are treated somehow as respectable, even enlightened members of the society.

We need a reality check. Attacking Social Security is both cruel and unnecessary. It needs to stop.

The demagogues would have the public believe that Social Security is unsustainable, that it is some kind of giant contributor to the federal budget deficits. Nothing could be further from the truth. As the Economic Policy Institute has explained, Social Security “is emphatically not the cause of the federal government’s long-term deficits, since it is prohibited from borrowing and must pay all benefits out of dedicated tax revenues and savings in its trust funds.”

Franklin Roosevelt couldn’t have been clearer about the crucial role of the payroll taxes used to finance Social Security. They gave the beneficiaries a “legal, moral and political right” to collect their benefits, he said. “With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my Social Security program.”

There has always been feverish opposition on the right to Social Security. What is happening now, in a period of deficit hysteria, is that this crucial retirement program is being dishonestly lumped together with Medicare as an entitlement program that is driving federal deficits. Medicare costs are a serious problem, but that’s because of the nightmarish expansion of health care costs in general.

Beyond Medicare, the major drivers of the deficits are not talked about so much by the fat cats and demagogues because they were either responsible for them, or are reaping gargantuan benefits from them, or both. The country is drowning in a sea of debt because of the obscene Bush tax cuts for the rich, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have never been paid for and the Great Recession.

Mugging the nation’s grandparents by depriving them of some of their modest, hard-earned Social Security retirement benefits is hardly an answer to the nation’s ills. And, believe me, those benefits are modest. The average benefit is just $14,000 a year, which is less than the minimum wage would pay. With employer-provided pensions going the way of the typewriter and pay telephones, the income from Social Security is becoming more precious by the day.

“If we didn’t have Social Security, we’d have to invent it right now,” said Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future. “It’s perfectly suited to the terrible times we’re going through. Hardly anyone has pensions anymore. People’s private savings have taken a huge hit, and home prices have been hit hard. So the private savings that so many seniors and soon-to-be seniors have counted on have just been wiped out.

“Social Security is still there, and it’s still paying out retirement benefits indexed to wages. It’s the one part of the retirement stool that is working.”

The deficit hawks and the right-wingers can scream all they want, but there is no Social Security crisis. There is a foreseeable problem with the program’s long-term financing, but it can be fixed with changes that do no harm to its elderly beneficiaries. One obvious step would be to raise the cap on payroll taxes so that wealthy earners shoulder a fairer share of the burden.

The alarmist rhetoric should cease. Americans have enough economic problems to worry about without being petrified that their Social Security benefits will be curtailed. A Gallup poll taken recently found that 90 percent of Americans ages 44 to 75 believed that the country was facing a retirement crisis. Nearly two-thirds were more fearful of depleting their assets than they were of dying. The fears about retirement are well placed — most Americans do not have enough to retire on. But there should be no reason to believe that Social Security is in jeopardy.

The folks who want to raise the retirement age and hack away at benefits for ordinary working Americans are inevitably those who have not the least worry about their own retirement. The haves so often get a perverse kick out of bullying the have-nots.


Responses

  1. In order to analyize the serious problems that exist in the ADMINISTRATION of SS, one must first take a look at who is exempt from SS…yep…the same folks who are exempt from Obamacare…yep…politicians. Of course, you may never consider them as an intergal part of the problem. After all, they are trying to force you to put your spotlight on ‘fat cats’…LOL

  2. Thanks maboulette, this is a great editorial and it should get wide dissemination. Which leads me to ask: how does one get permission to post an entire article like that? Is it given for such purposes (maybe some are and others aren’t?), did you make a request, etc., your answer would be helpful.

    Kyle: Sure, politicians should be part of SS like everyone else, and guess what: you’re wrong, they do:
    http://www.factcheck.org/…/do_members_of_congress_pay_social_security.html .
    The claim they don’t is another one of those “urban legends” that your type get virally from misleading emails etc. And maybe there are admin problems, let us know details instead of just boasting of them. (But you’ve already lost credibility with such a massive error ….) And sure keep an eye on politicians, but why not “fat cats” too? What, are you pimping for them?

  3. Say Neil…your link is broken…opppsss…guess your credibility is in the crapper…LOL

  4. No Kyle, my cred isn’t in the crapper. Here’s the link:
    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/do_members_of_congress_pay_social_security.html
    The first one was wrong because I copied it directly from the line under the Google search. Your cred is still ITC because your claim is wrong, and that’s a given.

    It’s really telling, that you didn’t even care to check on whether your original claim was true, but tried to make hay out of a technical error (equivalent to a pretend scientist trying to disprove a real one, by finding a typo in the latter’s article.)

  5. Social Security is only collected on I believe the first 106K of income. Most politicians pay themselves far more than that. Most of us out here in the real world don’t mind ‘old people’ getting Social Security. What we do mind is paying huge amounts of tax for a program that promises us something the government knows isn’t going to take place.Some of us actually maintain that is fraud.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

%d bloggers like this: