Posted by: maboulette | January 6, 2011


The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments t...

Image via Wikipedia

by Matt Schneider | 10:42 am, January 5th, 2011  Published by Mediaite

On MSNBC’s “The Last Word” with Lawrence O’Donnell, Republican Congressman Bob Goodlatte showed up to proudly boast of his plan to lead a reading of the Constitution on the floor of the House of Representatives. O’Donnell, however, wasn’t as eager to congratulate Goodlatte on the idea as he was to establish that in the past Goodlatte wasn’t too concerned with basing his legislative proposals on specific constitutional authority.

O’Donnell really revved up after learning that Goodlatte’s favorite Supreme Court Justice is Antonin Scalia, even despite Scalia being part of a majority opinion striking down Goodlatte’s law to restrict First Amendment rights on the Internet. Citing Goodlatte’s past vote for an increase in the minimum wage, O’Donnell wondered whether the minimum wage was constitutional? Goodlatte’s dumbfounded response: “I have not looked at the constitutionality of that issue.”

The exchange got even more uncomfortable with O’Donnell angrily wondering:

O’Donnell: “You voted for an increase in something that you don’t even know has constitutional authority to exist?”

Goodlatte: “That’s correct and that’s why it’s good to reinstate this focus on the Constitution as we debate these bills. In the future a minimum wage bill will have to have in it a declaration of the section of the Constitution that gives the authority to increase the minimum wage.”

It seems Goodlatte demonstrated the best argument yet why it is a great idea to have every bill cite to its constitutional authority: without it he might continue to be unconcerned about which constitutional provision grants Congress the power to act or might not even know where to look for it. O’Donnell here was well researched and aggressive, yet still respectful during the interrogation, and emphatically made the point that a symbolic reading of the Constitution means much less than an adherence by members of Congress to its words.


  1. So, the fact that he. Congressman Goodlatte, and others(whom I am sure do not include any Dems, eh?) Have not always held to the letter of the Constitution in the past precludes the possibility that they can now see their
    error, and wish to rectify it by ensuring that they, and all of their colleagues,
    are, in the future aware of what they can and can not do, according to said
    Constitution, by reading it in open session, so that everyone is aware of what it says? wow, Just wow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: